While jihadists despise the Western school system for its tolerance, co-education, and freedom, they also know that, along with the government and media, it is pertinent to infiltrate if they want to raise the Caliphate of an Islamic regime within free nations.
Much like the Islamization of schools in the U.K. through the Trojan Horse plot, schools in the U.S. are slowly introducing Islamic propaganda disguised as well-rounded education in cultural diversity and religious tolerance. However, unlike the U.K., it is not too late for us to take action against the indoctrination of our children of the most dangerous ideology in the world.
This is exactly what angry parents did when an Ohio high school “challenged” its students to walk in the proverbial footsteps of Muslims.
According to Jihad Watch, Mason High School sent a notice to parents encouraging their female students to wear a hijab to school for the whole day.
The email reads, “Mason High School is blessed to have a unique and diverse student body. In order celebrate this diversity and promote open-mindedness, the Muslim Student Association is inviting all female students to participate in “A Covered Girl Challenge” which will allow students to wear a headscarf for the whole school day. Afterwards, there will be a discussion (open for all students, male & female) held in Z223 to share experiences and reflections.”
The school’s encouragement of their Western students to don the headscarf is not only an effort to glamorize a symbol of medieval oppression, it is clear favoritism of the Islamic religion above all others, regardless of the usual cry for separation of church and state. Surely the school can’t really believe that celebrating and supporting only one religion is being diverse.
As convincing an argument that the assignment seeks to create open-mindedness and tolerance among their students, parents weren’t about to buy the weak attempt at uplifting the supremacist ideology that is Islam.
Instead of cowering before the left’s usual chastising of bigotry and “racism” (what race is Islam, again?), parents called and emailed the school immediately, expressing their concern with a public school’s dressing up of a religion that’s responsible for the slaughter of over 270 million non-Muslims since its establishment.
The event was quickly canceled, and the principal issued an apology, stating, “I now realize that as adults we should have given our students better guidance. After much consideration and after talking with the student event organizers, we have canceled the event.”
While the school tries to dodge responsibility and backlash by adding that the challenge was “student-led” by the Muslim Student Association (MSA), many are ignorant of the fact that the MSA has terrorist ties to some of the most violent and dangerous anti-American, Islamic jihadist organizations in the world.
Still, the parents smelled a rat before the whole nest was able to coax their impressionable youths with the same propaganda tactics utilized by the Islamic State.
“My belief is wearing these hijabs represents the oppression of women and Sharia law,” said former school board candidate Sharon Poe. “I do not recall ever getting an email announcing a Christian Cross Wearing day or a booth for information about the Christian persecution from Islamic terrorists. What happen to the argument of the separation of church and state?”
While Poe is speaking rhetorically, she, like many of us, knows that Islam finds special privilege in Western countries; although, non-Muslims find quite the opposite under Islamic law.
What Mason High School and the liberal left fails to acknowledge is that the hijab is a prominent symbol of the abuse, misogyny, and oppression against Muslim and non-Muslim women. Unlike here in the wonderful West, if a woman “chooses” to remove the hijab in a Muslim country, she faces an assortment of “punishments” like the ones listed below by Robert Spencer:
“…Aqsa Parvez, whose Muslim father choked her to death with her hijab after she refused to wear it; and of Amina Muse Ali, a Christian woman in Somalia whom Muslims murdered because she wasn’t wearing a hijab; and of the 40 women who were murdered in Iraq in 2007 for not wearing the hijab; and of Alya Al-Safar, whose Muslim cousin threatened to kill her and harm her family because she stopped wearing the hijab in Britain; and of Amira Osman Hamid, who faces whipping in Sudan for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Egyptian girl, also named Amira, who committed suicide after being brutalized for her family for refusing to wear the hijab; and of the Muslim and non-Muslim teachers at the Islamic College of South Australia who were told that they had to wear the hijab or be fired; and of the women in Chechnya whom police shot with paintballs because they weren’t wearing hijab; and of the women also in Chechnya who were threatened by men with automatic rifles for not wearing hijab; and of the elementary school teachers in Tunisia who were threatened with death for not wearing hijab; and of the Syrian schoolgirls who were forbidden to go to school unless they wore hijab; and of the women in Gaza whom Hamas has forced to wear hijab; and of the women in Iran who protested against the regime by daring to take off their legally-required hijab; and of the women in London whom Muslim thugs threatened to murder if they didn’t wear hijab; and of the anonymous young Muslim woman who doffed her hijab outside her home and started living a double life in fear of her parents…”
Perhaps the most relevant example for “A Covered Girl Challenge” would be for Muslims to tear off their hijabs in honor of the little girls burned alive by Meccan police, who stopped the children from leaving their burning school building and prevented rescue workers from saving them, simply because they were not wearing the required Islamic dress — the hijab.
However, Muslims are never offended by these incidents, even against their fellow followers, as long as it coincides with Islamic Sharia law. Beheading, raping, acid-throwing, enslavement, burning, kidnapping, and imprisonment are all justifiable reactions to unbelievers’ refusal to convert, but these Muslim students are offended by a badly drawn cartoon of the pedophiliac murderer Muhammad, not to mention parents’ disagreeing with encouragement of their beloved daughters to wear their oppressive religious symbol.